I have had the opportunity to observe and operate within many corporate cultures. These days, every organization knows they’re supposed to be customer-centric. I hear companies say it all the time, but what does it really take? How do you know
if you really have it?
I’ve been working with Axure for seven years now, and I’ve learned a thing or two about working with it efficiently. What follows are 10 rules that will help you build your Axure prototypes efficiently too.
Next week the eMetrics Marketing Optimization Summit begins in San Francisco, and once again someone from Evantage will be presenting. And, as it turns out, that someone is me! As a result, the Evantage User Experience team has graciously invite
d me to do my second guest post on this blog.
Last night my mom needed to buy a ticket for my 17-year-old brother to fly from Minneapolis back to San Francisco where they live. I was on the phone with her twice, walking her through the United Airlines website for over 20 minutes each time.
This is unacceptable. My mother, who is 55, isn’t very computer savvy but she does own a computer with an Internet connection, has taken programming classes, has done online dating, and has even managed to book
a ticket on Orbitz once… maybe twice.
Read the rest of this entry »
The process by which most enterprise software is developed is fatally flawed. There are flaws in any software development process, but in the past 13 years I’ve seen one approach produce more bad software and blow more budgets than any other: r
equirements-driven software development. Thankfully, I’ve also had the opportunity to see the success of an alternative type of process, a process in which user experience design drives what gets developed. This type of process helps teams deliver good software on time and within their budgets.
Evantage has been working in the healthcare realm for over 12 years now in a variety of projects. For the past 2 years, we have been working with a large hospital system to redesign the way they care for patients with chron
ic conditions. We’ve helped them establish and implement standard care guidelines for all providers and staff to proactively monitor and manage people with conditions like asthma, diabetes, heart failure, kidney disease, heart disease and hypertension (high blood pressure). This is a big change for providers, who today generally treat these patients only when they have complications or their condition worsens. Read the rest of this entry »
Whenever I am presented with steps on how to conduct an accessibility evaluation, user testing with real users is always listed as a step. What I rarely see is information on why testing is so important, what the benefits from testing real users are, and what you get by testing with real users that you can’t get by using accessibility tools or testing with your own screen reader.
Read the rest of this entry »
This month marked another milestone in game show history. On February 14-16, Jeopardy! champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter defended their trivial supremacy against Watson, a computer program created by IBM. Drawing on vast stores of
information and a complex algorithm for selecting the most probable answer, Watson all but ran the board on its way to a $1 million prize for IBM, which the company pledged to donate to charity. Yet the hype around Watson’s victory obscured a more important contest—that between humans and our ability to understand our own technology—and we’re not doing so well in that one, either. Read the rest of this entry »
As Lori discussed in the post Recruiting Agency + User Testing = Nirvana, Evantage typically uses a recruiting agency to recruit participan
ts for user studies. Recruiting agencies can be invaluable when identifying and scheduling participants for studies, but I have learned that is important to work closely with them to ensure the participants who are recruited are the ones that everyone intended they be. Likewise, it is important to find a firm that you have confidence in and that has the ability to find the participants you need. Based on my experience of working with recruiting agencies, I have put together a list of tips that you may find useful when working with agencies.
Read the rest of this entry »
Gestural, multi-touch user interfaces have made using a computer interesting again. This is good and bad. But two big names in usability, Jakob Nielsen and Don Norman, are concerned that it’s canadian pharmacy cialis
_a_step_backwards_in_usability_6.html”>more bad than good
. I am concerned that their response to the situation, a call for new guidelines, is a reactionary backlash that could hinder innovation and beauty in interaction design.
After scoffing at the idea at first, I sat down to think about whether it was possible to develop guidelines that are open enough to allow for innovation, playfulness, and beauty but strong enough to keep usability high. I think it might be, and these are my first thoughts about it. What follows is a series of conversation-starters, potential guidelines that need to be tested and vetted before they can be solid. For now, the discussion will be limited to skeuomorphic interfaces, but additional guidelines are necessary for multi-touch UI in general and novel UIs specifically.
Hover interactions are everywhere. Netflix shows you movie details when you point at the DVD image. Google’s image search results shows you a magnified thumbnail, filename, and dimensions. Yahoo! News displays the first sentence of a news article
when you point at a headline.
Hover overlays can add a lot of value when used judiciously, but they have their pitfalls. One factor that can make or break a hover is timing. If you’ve ever tried to read a page containing contextual advertising pop-ups, you’ve probably been irritated by how hard it is to avoid them—they’re on a hair trigger. A short delay between the time the user
points at the trigger object and the appearance of the extra information helps avoid accidental triggering and ensuing rage.
Personal Health Record (PHR) usage remains low, despite conventional wisdom that it could improve the health outcomes of pa
tients with chronic conditions. Evantage Consulting created an internal project to understand the factors that are contributing to the low use of PHRs and evaluate if a caregivers involvement could help drive its use and improve the health outcomes of people with chronic conditions.
Based on the qualitative study conducted with 20 chronically ill patients and/or their caregivers, we found that the caregiver’s involvement in managing a patient’s PHR could drive its use. However the current PHRs meet limited needs of patients with chronic conditions. To drive PHR use and improve health outcomes, patients and caregivers need simpler and more effective PHRs that can fit in their everyday life. The study was conducted in the months of August-September, 2010. All the people interviewed were using one of the available PHRs (Google Health, Microsoft health Vault, a provider-sponsored PHR, or payer-sponsored PHR).
Since we started planning a public Axure training , I have been thinking about what I was going to say in this blog post and when I would get to tell you all. Is it strange to get this excited about training Axure? Not really, at least for Evantage folks.
Ever since Fred Beecher started to extol the virtues of Axure in 2005 (well, mostly since we started listening to what he was saying, some time in 2007), we have loved how easy it is to create interactive prototypes using this tool.
Axure helps us easily communicate a design to clients, it makes usability testing more realistic, and it allows us to include our requirements in the prototype for business analysts and developers. Then Fred went and developed a half-day workshop for the 2007 IA Summit. It sold out, and the folks at Axure asked him to start traveling the country, training companies to use this awesome tool. That’s worked out so well that Fred brought me—and now we’re bringing Jeff Harrison—into the training fold.
Alongside the regular project work we do, we love sharing what we learn. Often, our students have some great idea that earns them a high five during class and an update to our training materials.
So, if you want to learn more about Axure, join Jeff and me on Wednesday, November 3, for the Basic Axure Training and Thursday, November 4, for the Advanced Prototyping class at Aloft in Minneapolis, MN. Each class is $600, but taking both will give you a 20% discount off the total cost. Bring an Axure project you’re working on, or a project you think
would convert well to Axure. We’ll see what you’ve done so far and help you make your document more efficient, or talk you through the best way to convert it. High fives all around!
For more information, CONTACT US
If you would like to join us for this event, REGISTER HERE
/* < ![CDATA[ */
var quicktagsL10n = {
quickLinks: “(Quick Links)”,
wordLookup: “Enter a word to look up:”,
dictionaryLookup: “Dictionary lookup”,
lookup: “lookup”,
closeAllOpenTags: “Close all open tags”,
closeTags: “cl
ose tags”,
enterURL: “Enter the URL”,
enterImageURL: “Enter the URL of the image”,
enterImageDescription: “Enter a description of the image”,
fullscreen: “fullscreen”,
toggleFullscreen: “Toggle fullscreen mode”
};
try{convertEntities(quicktagsL10n);}catch(e){};
/* ]]> */
edToolbar()
The other day I was asked the question “To what level does any website legally need to be made accessible?”
The law that exists today says that if you are the federal government or supply electronic and information technology goods and services to the federal government, then yes, you must comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (Section 508 Standards). This law requires “Federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology (EIT) accessible to people with disabilities.” (section508.gov)
Evantage Consulting is about 75% female. I know a lot of women personally who work in technology, and yet I still see that the majority of the “experts” in our field are male. Of all the technology conferences I have attended, there have always
been more men than women attendees and presenters. I’m not entirely sure why this is. There are two sides to this debate: whether women submit for conferences or whether conferences don’t do a good enough job of recruiting women to speak. I recently attending a one day conference for women in technology, and it was interesting what bubbled up to the surface on why women don’t submit or why women submissions aren’t selected. Read the rest of this entry »
/* < ![CDATA[ */
var quicktagsL10n = {
quickLinks: “(Quick Links)”,
wordLookup: “Enter a word to look up:”,
dictionaryLookup: “Dictionary lookup”,
lookup: “lookup”,
closeAllOpenTags: “Close all open tags”,
closeTags: “cl
ose tags”,
enterURL: “Enter the URL”,
enterImageURL: “Enter the URL of the image”,
enterImageDescription: “Enter a description of the image”,
fullscreen: “fullscreen”,
toggleFullscreen: “Toggle fullscreen mode”
};
try{convertEntities(quicktagsL10n);}catch(e){};
/* ]]> */
edToolbar()
Personal Health Records, or PHRs, are health records that are initiated and maintained by a patient. Government incentives to promote adoption and “meaningful use” of EHRs (Electronic Health Records) by physicians has also raised the healthcare community’s interest in online PHRs such as Google Health and Microsoft Vault. A recent California Healthcare Foundation survey revealed that PHRs can empower some people to take better care of themselves, especially people with chronic conditions. However, the growth of PHR use remains low even for this high-potential segment.
Evantage believes that a key component of this issue is the involvement of caregivers in a patient’s PHR. To dig deeper, we are conducting primary research with patients and their caregivers. We want to learn how to improve the design of PHRs to incorporate the needs of patients who have caregivers. We want to learn whether a better designed PHR could empower patients and their caregivers to use it more and experience improved health outcomes as a result.
Read the rest of this entry »
/* < ![CDATA[ */
var quicktagsL10n = {
quickLinks: “(Quick Links)”,
wordLookup: “Enter a word to look up:”,
dictionaryLookup: “Dictionary lookup”,
lookup: “lookup”,
closeAllOpenTags: “Close all open tags”,
closeTags: “cl
ose tags”,
enterURL: “Enter the URL”,
enterImageURL: “Enter the URL of the image”,
enterImageDescription: “Enter a description of the image”,
fullscreen: “fullscreen”,
toggleFullscreen: “Toggle fullscreen mode”
};
try{convertEntities(quicktagsL10n);}catch(e){};
/* ]]> */
edToolbar()
Lately, I’ve been preaching about how it’s important for UX designers to understand the technology our designs will be implemented in. I’m going to try to put this gospel into practice by unpacking for you the hidden treasures that HTML5 offers UX designers. HTML5 is a big deal. Maybe the biggest deal in Web technology since JavaScript. (I’m still in denial about Flash.) HTML5 is going to make it easy for developers to make websites with desktop application interactivity, performance, and functionality, which is going to open up vast horizons of possibility for UX designers.
/* < ![CDATA[ */
var quicktagsL10n = {
quickLinks: “(Quick Links)”,
wordLookup: “Enter a word to look up:”,
dictionaryLookup: “Dictionary lookup”,
lookup: “lookup”,
closeAllOpenTags: “Close all open tags”,
closeTags: “cl
ose tags”,
enterURL: “Enter the URL”,
enterImageURL: “Enter the URL of the image”,
enterImageDescription: “Enter a description of the image”,
fullscreen: “fullscreen”,
toggleFullscreen: “Toggle fullscreen mode”
};
try{convertEntities(quicktagsL10n);}catch(e){};
/* ]]> */
edToolbar()
How do you communicate danger to people who don’t speak your language? How do you not only alert them, but give them enough information to act even though you will never meet face-to-face? These questions were behind an effort to design a warning for the proposed nuclear waste storage facility inside Nevada’s Yucca Mountain, and they’re similar to the ones you face when trying to design for user security online.
In 2003, the Desert Space Foundation, a Nevada arts organization, hosted an exhibition that showcased novel ideas for a warning sign that would retain both its meaning and its structural integrity for the 10,000 years that Yucca Mountain was projected to pose a hazard. The difficulty of the task manifested itself in the variety of entries. Several artists assumed that familiar symbols like the yellow and black radiation icon would carry the scent of danger across the divide, but not everyone agreed, according to a Los Angeles Times article at the time.
The risk of radiation burns is lower for Internet users (especially with modern LCD monitors), but being online can be dangerous all the same. The recipients of the communication are separated not by time but by their lack of technical expertise. However, the complexity of the threat and the jargon used to describe it is at least as opaque to many people as ancient pictograms can be to us.
Read the rest of this entry »
In the recent past, I have been tasked with designing mobile applications for iPhone. Axure is the prototyping tool we use at Evantage and it has served me well in terms of creating prototypes for mobile applications and demonstrating them on a l
aptop. However, I have had trouble viewing the prototypes on an iPhone. The screen size shrinks on the iPhone making it difficult to read the content on the screen. In the near future we expect to use these prototypes to gather feedback from users and design applications for other devices (Android, Blackberry, iPad, etc). To ensure that we have the tools at Evantage to meet the demand, I spent some time looking at the workarounds with Axure and pros and cons of other mobile prototyping tools designed for the UX community.
Read the rest of this entry »
